Sell on marketplaces & offline

Blinkit now buys stock from brands instead of listing it. What changes for my brand?

Blinkit, part of Eternal (formerly Zomato), moved from a marketplace to an inventory-led model in 2025, the way Zepto already worked: the platform raises purchase orders, buys your stock at a negotiated trade price and resells it, instead of you listing goods and paying a commission. Three things change. Your margin is now the gap between your trade price and your costs, so negotiate the buying margin, payment terms and who funds discounts as carefully as you once read the commission sheet. You control the shelf price less, because the platform sets it within your MRP. And fill rate becomes the relationship: purchase orders follow daily demand, and short or late supply costs you ranking and future orders. Ask for sell-through and stock data by city and dark store in the agreement, since you no longer see the customer order yourself.

Go deeper

4 resources, 4 India-specific, 3 link-checked.

📄 Article
✓ Link checked India Free Intermediate

Inc42's July 2025 analysis of Blinkit's move from a marketplace to buying stock from brands, and what that does to the platform's margins and its bargaining position with suppliers.

Blinkit Inventory Model: A Cure For The Cash Burn Problem?

From Inc42 by Lokesh Choudhary

  • Under the inventory model Blinkit buys goods from brands and holds the stock, controlling restocking, shelf life and assortment
  • Zepto already ran an inventory-led model with a higher take rate than Blinkit's marketplace
  • Direct buying strengthens the platform's hand in negotiations with brands
Open inc42.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked India Free Intermediate

A September 2026 operating guide from an Indian order-management software company on running replenishment, fill rates and assortment across the three largest quick commerce apps.

Quick Commerce Playbook for 2026: How Brands Can Scale on Blinkit, Zepto & Instamart

From Unicommerce by Sakshi Sinha

  • Purchase orders follow daily demand, so brands restock every 24-48 hours rather than every one to two weeks
  • Fill rate of roughly 95-98% is the working benchmark, and low fill rates cost ranking
  • Fewer fast-moving SKUs, compact packs and 60-120 days of shelf life suit dark stores
Open unicommerce.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked India Free Intermediate

An honest, founder-sourced look at the fee stack squeezing D2C margins across marketplaces and quick commerce. Read it to calibrate expectations before you sign, the numbers move, but the direction of squeeze is real.

Brands In Catch-22: Ecommerce Platform Fees Grow, Margins Shrink

From Inc42 by Inc42

  • Layered costs, commission, fulfilment, listing, ads, compound fast on q-comm
  • Founders describe being 'left with almost nothing' after all charges
  • D2C offers better margin but demands heavy upfront CAC and logistics investment
Open inc42.com →
📄 Article
India Paid Advanced

The Ken's deep, unsentimental reporting on how q-comm dependence compresses brand margins to the bone, including the founder line about running a business to pay commissions rather than to make money. Paywalled but worth it for the honesty. (URL live but bot-blocked; verify manually.)

Brands Once Desperate For Quick Commerce Now Have A Tiger By The Tail

From The Ken by The Ken

  • Margins reported as low as ~3% when half of revenue comes from q-comm
  • Commission plus in-app visibility can consume a large share of revenue
  • 70%+ gross margin brands cope; others use q-comm as loss-making acquisition
Open the-ken.com →

Terms in this answer

People also ask

eChai Partner Brands The partnership →