📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This is the canonical founder-side explainer of what a board actually is and when you owe someone a seat. It spells out the standard seed board (two founder seats, one investor seat, so founders keep the majority), why an outside/independent director gets added, and what the board formally approves, which is the exact gap between a board member and someone who just gives advice.
From
Y Combinator Startup Library
by Y Combinator (Kirsty Nathoo and Aaron Epstein)
15 min read
- At seed the board is usually two founder seats plus one investor seat, so founders keep voting control; you do not have to give a seat at all if the round does not require it.
- A board director votes on and approves the decisions that matter most (budgets, hiring or firing the CEO, selling the company, the next raise), which is a different thing from an advisor.
- The independent seat is the swing vote; treat who fills it as a real decision, not a formality to hand the investor.
Open
ycombinator.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
Iskold does the board control math out loud with a worked example: two 40% founders sell 20% to an investor, and the investor still gets a preferred board seat, showing how voting power diverges from ownership. He then walks the exact seed (2 common, 1 preferred) to Series A (add a fifth or leave the independent seat vacant to keep founder control) evolution, which is the founder-friendly structure and rationale you want.
From
Startup Hacks (2048 Ventures)
by Alex Iskold
12 min read
- Board seats come from preferred stock rights, not from how much of the company the investor owns, so a small stake can still buy a seat.
- A 2 founder, 1 investor seed board keeps founders in control; at Series A leaving the independent seat vacant (2 common, 2 preferred) keeps that control.
- Voting math is not full safety: a co-founder can side with the investor to remove the CEO, so who sits in each seat matters as much as the count.
Open
startuphacks.vc →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
In Indian deals the real control lever often sits next to the board seat: affirmative rights (reserved matters) in the term sheet and shareholders' agreement. This piece lists exactly what an investor can veto (share capital changes, key hires and exits, new debt, business suspension) and cites the Shubkam Ventures ruling on why these rights alone do not legally hand over control, which is the India-specific nuance a founder needs before signing.
From
Ediplis Counsels
by Namratha Krishnan
8 min read
- Affirmative or reserved rights let an investor veto specific decisions even without a board majority: capital changes, senior hires, new debt, charter amendments, winding down.
- Indian precedent (Shubkam Ventures) holds that affirmative rights alone do not equal legal control under the SEBI Takeover Code, but they still bind founders on day-to-day moves.
- Read the reserved matters list as carefully as the board seat: it is where an investor gets a say without ever needing to sit on the board.
Open
ediplis.com →