📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
YC's answer to what you need before a seed round is not a revenue number, it is a rate: raise once your product is being adopted at an interestingly rapid rate, with 10 percent per week for several weeks cited as impressive. That reframes the whole question for an Indian founder sitting on modest absolute numbers: a small base growing fast beats a large-looking base that is flat. Use it as the counterweight to the Blume floor.
From
Y Combinator
by Geoff Ralston
20 min read
- The readiness test is a growth rate, not a milestone: a product being adopted at an interestingly rapid rate, with 10 percent week over week for several weeks called impressive.
- Raise when you have figured out the market and built something people are adopting fast, not before you have that signal and not after you have already stalled.
- Minimize time in fundraising mode: a tight, fast-growth story lets you raise quickly and get back to building instead of dragging a weak deck around for months.
Open
ycombinator.com →
✍️ Essay
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
Written by a partner at Blume Ventures, this is the India-specific version of exactly what we're telling founders: valuation is not a spreadsheet output, it is (in Fred Wilson's line the piece builds on) the exhaust fumes of a negotiation about two things, the amount raised and the dilution. It shows the real Indian seed math (a roughly 1 to 1.5M dollar cheque for a 15 to 20 percent stake, back-solving to a 5 to 7.5M dollar post-money) and why the VC sizes the round to get you to Series A, not to please your ego.
From
Blume Ventures
by Sajith Pai
15 min read
- Post-money is just cheque size divided by target stake: a 1M dollar cheque for 20 percent is a 5M dollar post-money, nothing more mystical
- Indian seed VCs anchor on a 15 to 20 percent target stake and a cheque sized to fund the runway to Series A
- The price falls out of the raise-and-dilution negotiation, so shaping those two levers matters more than arguing a valuation
Open
sajithpai.medium.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
Once you accept that the market sets the price, this piece shows you the actual methods investors reach for when there is no revenue to anchor on: comparables from recent deals, the scorecard method, the VC method working back from a target exit, and Berkus. Knowing the frameworks on the other side of the table lets you run a tighter process and read whether a term sheet is priced off real comps or a founder's optimism.
From
Mercury
by Mercury
12 min read
- With no revenue, investors lean on comparables and scorecards weighted by team, market size, and traction, not a DCF
- The VC method reverse-engineers your price from the fund's required multiple, which is why a 5M dollar entry needs a plausible 100x story
- Valuation here is openly 'as much art as science', so multiple credible bidders move the number more than any single method
Open
mercury.com →