Everything from

Bessemer Venture Partners (Atlas)

2 resources from Bessemer Venture Partners (Atlas) we point founders to, and the questions each answers.

📄 Article
✓ Link checked India Free Intermediate

Why we picked it Bessemer's report is the most grounded, data-backed look at how Indian SaaS companies actually split between selling to India first and going global from day one. It names both camps (Perfios, Lentra, DarwinBox on the India side; Freshworks, Zoho, Gainsight on the global side) and notes that many still begin at home and expand outward. That real spread of outcomes is more useful for your decision than any single opinion.

The Rise of SaaS in India

From Bessemer Venture Partners (Atlas) by Bessemer Venture Partners Long report, roughly 20 to 30 minutes

  • Both paths produce real winners: some Indian SaaS firms sell to India first, others go global from day one, and the report names companies in each camp.
  • A common pattern is starting with Indian customers and expanding into adjacent regions once the product and motion are proven.
  • Virtual selling lets Indian teams reach global customers from India, so the choice is less about geography and more about where your buyers are.
Open bvp.com →
Answers For an Indian B2B SaaS, is it better to win a niche in India first or go straight for a global niche? How do I decide between selling to Indian customers or going straight for dollar revenue from global customers as a bootstrapped founder?
✍️ Essay
✓ Link checked Free Intermediate

Why we picked it Bessemer built this from years of their own portfolio data, and it is the piece that answers the real question hiding inside "do these matter at my stage": what an efficient company looks like at $1 to 10M ARR is very different from $50M plus. It lays out stage-by-stage targets for growth rate, CAC payback, and efficiency (their magic-number cousin), so you can see whether an investor's benchmark even applies to where you are. Treat it as a reference map, not a scorecard: early on, high growth with heavier burn is normal, and the efficiency bar tightens as you scale.

Scaling to $100 Million

From Bessemer Venture Partners (Atlas) by Mary D'Onofrio, Bessemer Venture Partners long read plus benchmark charts

  • Efficiency expectations are stage-dependent: growth rates near 200 percent early fall toward 60 percent by $100M ARR, and the burn and payback bars tighten as you go, so a single "good" number does not exist across stages.
  • Bessemer targets roughly a 70 percent efficiency score around $25 to 50M ARR and about 50 percent past $100M, useful context when an investor quotes you a ratio.
  • At the earliest stage these ratios are noisy and less predictive, so use them to sanity-check unit economics, not to run the company by.
Open bvp.com →
Answers Investors keep asking about my "magic number" and payback efficiency. What are these and do they matter at my stage?