📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This is the cleanest plain, formula-first explainer of the magic number: it gives you the exact calculation (quarter-over-quarter new revenue, annualized, divided by prior-quarter sales and marketing spend) and then tells you how to read the result. It names the working thresholds an investor actually has in mind (below 0.75 is inefficient, 0.75 to 1.0 is moderate, above 1.0 is strong) and walks a worked example, so you can compute your own number before your next meeting instead of nodding along.
From
Wall Street Prep
by Wall Street Prep
~10 min read
- Magic number = (this quarter's revenue minus last quarter's, times 4) divided by last quarter's sales and marketing spend, so it asks how much new annual recurring revenue each dollar of go-to-market buys.
- Rough read: above 1.0 means spend more, you are converting efficiently; below 0.75 means fix the funnel before you pour in more budget.
- It is a quarterly, backward-looking ratio, so one noisy quarter is not a verdict; investors watch the trend, not a single reading.
Open
wallstreetprep.com →
✍️ Essay
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
Bessemer built this from years of their own portfolio data, and it is the piece that answers the real question hiding inside "do these matter at my stage": what an efficient company looks like at $1 to 10M ARR is very different from $50M plus. It lays out stage-by-stage targets for growth rate, CAC payback, and efficiency (their magic-number cousin), so you can see whether an investor's benchmark even applies to where you are. Treat it as a reference map, not a scorecard: early on, high growth with heavier burn is normal, and the efficiency bar tightens as you scale.
From
Bessemer Venture Partners (Atlas)
by Mary D'Onofrio, Bessemer Venture Partners
long read plus benchmark charts
- Efficiency expectations are stage-dependent: growth rates near 200 percent early fall toward 60 percent by $100M ARR, and the burn and payback bars tighten as you go, so a single "good" number does not exist across stages.
- Bessemer targets roughly a 70 percent efficiency score around $25 to 50M ARR and about 50 percent past $100M, useful context when an investor quotes you a ratio.
- At the earliest stage these ratios are noisy and less predictive, so use them to sanity-check unit economics, not to run the company by.
Open
bvp.com →