📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
This is the mechanical playbook for the 'send to 15 who actually invest, not 50' point: build a long list from Crunchbase, AngelList, and Pitchbook, then qualify each name by their most common round, whether they lead or follow, their check size, and their domain expertise, and stack-rank down to a top 30. It tells you exactly which fields to fill in a spreadsheet so you stop blasting funds that never write your stage or sector.
From
Mercury
by Mercury
12 min read
- Qualify every investor on stage, lead-or-follow, check size, and sector fit before they go on the list, so a thesis mismatch never eats a slot
- Pull raw names from Crunchbase, AngelList, Pitchbook, and the firm portfolios of companies like yours, then organize in a Notion or Airtable tracker
- Stack-rank to a top 30 and pitch in waves: refine on second-tier funds first, then hit the ones you most want with a sharpened story
Open
mercury.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This is what 'research the fund before you send' looks like for an Indian founder: a single fund broken down into its actual thesis (India-first companies that scale globally), stage (seed and Series A), check size (roughly 200K to 2.5M dollars), sector focus, and how they take intros. Read one of these on every fund on your list and you can write the tailored first slide that names their exact angle instead of a generic one.
From
Superscout
by Superscout
8 min read
- Blume writes seed and Series A cheques of about 200K to 2.5M dollars into India-rooted companies built to scale globally, so map your stage and geography to that before pitching
- The page names the sectors they actually deploy into (fintech, healthcare, climate, SaaS, frontier tech) plus portfolio proof points you can mirror in a tailored slide
- Most Blume deals come through warm intros from their own founders and the ecosystem, which is your cue to find a portfolio-founder path in rather than cold-emailing
Open
superscout.co →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
This nails the core idea that you keep one story and change what it is asked to prove: adjust the problem framing, swap in the one or two proof points that matter to this investor (retention and margin direction for a growth thesis, a specific market for a sector thesis), and lead with the metric they care about. It is the lightweight three-change approach, not a rebuild, so you can turn a master deck around in under 30 minutes per fund.
From
Viktori
by Viktori
10 min read
- Do not change the story, change what the story is asked to prove: same deck, different lead proof point per investor thesis
- Swap emphasis by investor lens: TAM and unit economics for a scale-focused fund, the served segment and traction for an early-stage one
- Keep the core deck lean and push investor-specific detail into appendices, one-pagers, and demos so you never maintain many full versions
Open
viktori.co →