7 resources from EquityList we point founders to, and the questions each answers.
📄 Article
✓ Link checkedIndiaFreeBeginner
Why we picked it
Written by EquityList, the India-based cap table platform, so it speaks to founders managing ESOP pools and dematerialised shares under Indian norms, not just Delaware C-corps. It walks a two-founder company round by round with real percentages (about 71 percent held post-seed, 57 percent post-Series A, 46 percent post-Series B, 36 percent post-Series C) so you can see exactly where the option pool and each raise leave you. That forward view is the whole point: if your model puts two founders in single digits by Series B, you are raising too much too early or on bad terms.
Why we picked it
Written by an India-based cap table platform, so the modeling assumptions match how Indian founders actually raise. It walks a concrete stack (a $250K SAFE at $5M cap = 5%, then a $500K SAFE at the same cap = 10%) to show you giving away 15% before Series A even opens, then models the Series A on top so you see founder equity drop from 85% to roughly 64%. This is the ownership-percentage-that-the-cap-implies math the answer is pointing at, done for you.
Why we picked it
EquityList runs cap tables and ESOP admin for Indian startups, so this places MFN inside the instrument choices an Indian founder actually faces. It states the mechanic cleanly (if a future SAFE gets a lower cap or bigger discount, MFN holders can adopt it) and, crucially, frames the India reality: SAFEs are not native to Indian company law, so you are usually running convertible notes (DPIIT-recognized startup, minimum 25 lakh cheque), where the same most-favored logic applies to the cap and discount you can later offer.
In India you are typically issuing convertible notes, not US SAFEs (DPIIT recognition and a 25 lakh minimum apply), but the MFN backward-repricing risk on cap and discount carries over unchanged
MFN means any better term you later grant can be claimed by earlier holders, which directly narrows the room you have to sweeten a bridge or close a reluctant investor
Read every early instrument's conversion mechanics side by side before your next raise, because MFN plus pro-rata rights compound founder dilution when they all converge on the most protective terms
Why we picked it
The single clearest explanation of the two documents Indian founders confuse: the founders' agreement (equity, vesting, roles, IP, departure, signed at or before incorporation) versus the shareholders' agreement (investor voting rights, drag/tag, reserved matters, signed at your raise). It nails the timing rule that trips people up: sign before shares are issued, because you cannot bolt vesting onto already-issued shares without every founder consenting. It is blunt that IP a founder built before incorporation belongs to that founder personally until a formal IP Assignment moves it to the company, which is exactly what breaks a diligence during your first term sheet.
Founders' agreement governs the co-founder relationship; the shareholders' agreement layers in investor protections later, they are not the same document
Sign at or before incorporation and always before shares are issued, or vesting cannot be applied retroactively
Pre-incorporation IP stays with the individual founder until a formal IP Assignment Agreement transfers it to the company
Why we picked it
This draws the exact line you are asking about with Indian numbers: a late-joining co-founder lands at 20 to 40 percent, while even a pre-seed CXO gets 1 to 3 percent and a senior individual contributor 0.2 to 0.7 percent, all out of a 10 to 15 percent ESOP pool. Put your candidate on that scale and the gap between founder equity and an ESOP grant becomes impossible to blur with a title. It also covers the India-specific mechanics: pool sizing, board and shareholder approvals, and vesting under Indian company law.
Late co-founders (joining 6-plus months in) sit at 20 to 40 percent; if you are offering under 20 percent, they are an early employee, not a co-founder.
Early hires draw from a 10 to 15 percent ESOP pool: CXOs 1 to 3 percent, senior ICs 0.2 to 0.7 percent, junior roles under 0.2 percent.
Indian ESOP grants need formal board and shareholder approval and standard 4-year vesting with a 1-year cliff, so plan the paperwork, not just the percentage.
Why we picked it
This is the India-specific playbook for exactly your situation: it names full-time versus part-time commitment as a reason to weight the split unequally, and then shows you where that gets written down under Indian law (the founders' agreement plus the SHA, with vesting and leaver provisions, and the Register of Members under the Companies Act, 2013). It also tells you to build in a formal re-split process for when the part-timer's commitment changes, which is precisely the trigger you are trying to pre-agree.
Full-time versus part-time commitment at founding is a legitimate reason to split unequally, do not default to 50/50.
The split and vesting must live in the founders' agreement and the SHA, and be reflected in the statutory Register of Members, or investors will flag it in diligence.
Agree a formal process now to revisit the split and vesting when a founder's commitment materially changes, so the part-timer going full-time is documented, not argued about later.
Why we picked it
This is the exact playbook for a Pvt Ltd founder: the eight sequential approvals in order, from checking your AoA permits ESOPs, to the board resolution, the 21-day shareholder notice, the ordinary-resolution vote, filing MGT-14 within 30 days, issuing grant letters, and maintaining the SH-6 register. It also lists the 15 clauses your scheme document must carry (vesting, separation treatment, clawback), so nothing gets skipped in due diligence.
Your ESOP is not real until the board approves the scheme, shareholders pass the resolution, and you file Form MGT-14 with the RoC within 30 days
A grant only exists once a signed grant letter states the option count, exercise price, vesting schedule, and expiry; verbal promises carry zero legal weight
You must maintain a Register of Employee Stock Options in Form SH-6, and missing it puts the company in regulatory default
