📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
YC's counterpoint is worth hearing precisely because it pushes back on being stingy: if this person is a real co-founder doing years of work ahead of you, generosity buys motivation across a four-year vest and prevents resentment. Read it against your traction story to decide honestly whether this is a true co-founder (lean generous) or an early employee wearing the title (grant, not founder equity). It is also the canonical source on why a one-year cliff and four-year vesting are non-negotiable.
From
Y Combinator
by Y Combinator
10 min read
- Most of the work is still ahead, so under-paying a genuine co-founder in equity breeds resentment that vesting stretches over four years.
- A cliff means someone who leaves inside year one walks away with nothing, protecting you from a bad early bet.
- Use the generosity test as a gut check: if you would not give founder-level equity, be honest that this is an early hire, not a co-founder.
Open
ycombinator.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
The single clearest explanation of the two documents Indian founders confuse: the founders' agreement (equity, vesting, roles, IP, departure, signed at or before incorporation) versus the shareholders' agreement (investor voting rights, drag/tag, reserved matters, signed at your raise). It nails the timing rule that trips people up: sign before shares are issued, because you cannot bolt vesting onto already-issued shares without every founder consenting. It is blunt that IP a founder built before incorporation belongs to that founder personally until a formal IP Assignment moves it to the company, which is exactly what breaks a diligence during your first term sheet.
From
EquityList
by EquityList
15 min read
- Founders' agreement governs the co-founder relationship; the shareholders' agreement layers in investor protections later, they are not the same document
- Sign at or before incorporation and always before shares are issued, or vesting cannot be applied retroactively
- Pre-incorporation IP stays with the individual founder until a formal IP Assignment Agreement transfers it to the company
Open
equitylist.co →
Why we picked it
Carta administers cap tables for tens of thousands of startups, so this is the canonical reference on how vesting actually mechanically works: the 1-year cliff, monthly vesting after it, and acceleration provisions. Their own data shows 92% of venture-backed companies put founders on vesting, which is the number to quote when a co-founder says 'we trust each other, we don't need this.' We could not fetch it live (Carta blocks automated requests with a 403), but the URL is the durable canonical page.
From
Carta
by Carta
12 min read
- The 1-year cliff means zero equity vests until month 12, then 25% vests in one lump and the remainder vests monthly over the next 3 years.
- Acceleration clauses (single vs double trigger) decide what happens to unvested shares on an acquisition, worth understanding before you sign a term sheet.
- 92% of venture-backed startups put founders on vesting, so it is the default expectation, not an edge case you are opting into.
Open
carta.com →