📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
This is the guide that maps advisor structure to your exact stage, so you can see why a formal board is overkill at pre-seed. It says pre-seed relationships should stay informal and ad-hoc (median 0.21% equity, no titles), and that structure and paper only start earning their keep at seed when an advisor is doing recurring GTM or fundraising work. It gives real numbers (up to 0.8% at seed, 2 to 4 year vesting, one-year cliff) so you can tell a genuine formalization from cap-table clutter.
From
Allied Venture Partners
by Allied Venture Partners
15 min read
- Pre-seed advisors should be informal domain experts, not a named board with equity grants
- Formalize at seed only when an advisor does recurring GTM, sales, or fundraising work
- Advisory boards give non-binding advice with no voting rights or fiduciary duty, unlike a board of directors
Open
allied.vc →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
This is the India-context piece for when you actually grant an advisor equity, written by a firm that does startup ESOP and advisor-equity work here. It walks the granting mechanics an Indian founder hits (board approval, a documented grant agreement, stock options vs RSUs, 4-year 25%-per-year vesting) and flags that advisor grants should stay in the 0.25% to 5% band across the whole pool. Read it before you promise equity so an advisor's title cannot become a later claim on your cap table without documented, vesting-gated work.
From
Treelife
by Treelife
10 min read
- Advisor grants in India go through board approval plus a documented grant agreement, not a handshake
- Keep total advisor equity within 0.25% to 5%, with vesting (e.g. 4 years, 25% per year) to gate it on real contribution
- Stock options vs RSUs each carry different tax and cap-table treatment worth confirming with an India-focused advisor
Open
treelife.in →