This is a remarkable submission. [...] While a chatbot has an interactive component, it is still just a part of Air Canada's website. It should be obvious to Air Canada that it is responsible for all the information on its website. It makes no difference whether the information comes from a static page or a chatbot. [...] I find Air Canada did not take reasonable care to ensure its chatbot was accurate. [...] There is no reason why Mr. Moffatt should know that one section of Air Canada's webpage is accurate, and another is not.
Jake Moffatt asked Air Canada's website chatbot about bereavement fares before flying to a funeral in November 2022. The chatbot told him he could book at full price and apply for the bereavement rate within ninety days. Air Canada's actual policy does not allow a retroactive claim, and the airline argued at the tribunal that the chatbot was a separate legal entity responsible for its own actions. On 14 February 2024 the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal found negligent misrepresentation and awarded Moffatt 812.02 Canadian dollars. It is the decision every later chatbot-liability argument is measured against: what your assistant says is what your company said.