-
Where the rumour became public, at 3.4 million views over a weekend. Curran writes about AI to a large audience and is not a mathematician; he later says he had no independent information. Every specific in it is wrong: it was not Anthropic's result, it was not Navier-Stokes, and it was not out for expert review. Buckmaster's statement records that a rumour of this shape is what he wrote to OpenAI about two days later.
Andrew Curran
It's fun to make predictions. Here's a new one:
Anthropic has solved a Millennium Prize Problem.
And I'll be even more specific.
Claude has solved Navier–Stokes.
It is out for expert review.
And to give myself a hard deadline, they will announce it before the IPO.
Andrew Curran's post on X, curated on eChai
eChai Partner Brands
The partnership →
