Podcast

AI, Liability, and Hallucinations in a Changing Tech and Law Environment

Stanford Legal podcast · law.stanford.edu

Stanford Law faculty on who is liable when AI gets the law wrong, you or the model.

Open on law.stanford.edu ↗

It answers 2 questions

  1. Where is AI legal help dangerous, what still needs a human lawyer?
  2. Is it safe to paste confidential contracts into ChatGPT?

Read with it

  1. The privilege gap explained: your AI chats are discoverable, your lawyer conversations are not. artificiallawyer.com Article ChatGPT Has No Legal Privilege: Is This A Problem? Artificial Lawyer
  2. A 3x general counsel draws the exact line between AI-safe questions and lawyer-required ones. gc.ai Article AI Legal Advice: What It Does and Where Liability Sits GC AI (Cecilia Ziniti)
  3. The bar association's plain-language taxonomy of the three ways AI fabricates law. nysba.org Article Beyond the Mirage: Beware of Generative AI and Hallucinations New York State Bar Association
  4. Why general LLMs lack the citation, context, and privilege protections professional legal work demands. tlpodcast.com Podcast Beyond ChatGPT: Why In-House Counsel Need Purpose Built AI (Cecilia Ziniti) Technically Legal podcast
  5. The definitive peer-reviewed study: even Westlaw and Lexis AI hallucinate, general chatbots far worse. hai.stanford.edu Article AI on Trial: Legal Models Hallucinate in 1 out of 6 (or More) Benchmarking Queries Stanford HAI / RegLab
  6. A live database of 1,300+ court cases involving AI-fabricated content, sobering to browse before trusting a citation. damiencharlotin.com Tool AI Hallucination Cases Database Damien Charlotin
eChai Partner Brands The partnership →