Team, Co-founders & Legal

What is the difference between issuing shares to a co-founder and giving them stock options, and which should I use in an Indian private limited company?

A starting point

Co-founders should hold actual shares (subject to reverse vesting), not options. Options are for employees. In an Indian Pvt Ltd, you issue founders sweat equity shares or subscribe them to the MoA at incorporation, then wrap those shares in a reverse-vesting agreement so the company can buy back unvested shares if they leave. Giving a co-founder ESOPs instead of shares is a red flag that they are being treated as staff, and it creates tax and control problems down the line.

Go deeper

Hand-picked from around the web, each with a note on why it earns your time.

2 resources 2 link-checked

Read

📄 Article
✓ Link checked India Free Intermediate

Why we picked it This is the cleanest answer to why a co-founder should hold shares, not ESOPs, in an Indian Pvt Ltd. It spells out Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules: a promoter or director holding over 10 percent equity is barred from receiving ESOPs at all, which is exactly why options are the wrong instrument for a founder. It then lays out the real founder routes (sweat equity shares, the narrow 10-year DPIIT startup exception) and cites the Vijay Shekhar Sharma unvested-ESOP forfeiture as the cautionary tale.

Can ESOPs Be Issued to Promoters & Founders? Legal Guide

From Startup Movers by Startup Movers 10 min read

  • Under Rule 13, a promoter or director holding more than 10 percent equity generally cannot receive ESOPs, so options do not fit a real co-founder.
  • Founders take equity as sweat equity shares or subscription at incorporation; DPIIT-recognised startups get a narrow 10-year window to grant founders ESOPs.
  • The Paytm founder having to surrender 21 million unvested ESOPs shows the control and forfeiture risk of dressing a founder up as an option-holder.
Open startup-movers.com
📄 Article
✓ Link checked India Free Intermediate

Why we picked it The India-specific piece that tells you where the split actually gets signed. It separates the founders' agreement (equity, roles, IP, vesting between you) from the shareholders' agreement (your terms with investors), and stresses the timing that trips Indian founders up: get vesting in writing before shares are issued, because you cannot bolt it on retroactively once the cap table exists. It also breaks down good-leaver vs bad-leaver treatment, which is the clause that decides what a departing cofounder actually keeps.

Founder Vesting in a Shareholders' Agreement: What Startup Founders Must Know

From Treelife by Treelife 10 min read

  • Document cofounder equity and vesting at or before incorporation and before shares issue, since Indian law makes retroactive vesting nearly impossible without every founder consenting
  • The 4-year vest with 1-year cliff is standard in India too, with unvested shares forfeited to the company at nominal price in a bad-leaver exit
  • Negotiate clear, objective good-leaver vs bad-leaver criteria and ensure already-vested shares are retained regardless of how you exit
Open treelife.in

People also ask