📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
This is the cleanest answer to why a co-founder should hold shares, not ESOPs, in an Indian Pvt Ltd. It spells out Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules: a promoter or director holding over 10 percent equity is barred from receiving ESOPs at all, which is exactly why options are the wrong instrument for a founder. It then lays out the real founder routes (sweat equity shares, the narrow 10-year DPIIT startup exception) and cites the Vijay Shekhar Sharma unvested-ESOP forfeiture as the cautionary tale.
From
Startup Movers
by Startup Movers
10 min read
- Under Rule 13, a promoter or director holding more than 10 percent equity generally cannot receive ESOPs, so options do not fit a real co-founder.
- Founders take equity as sweat equity shares or subscription at incorporation; DPIIT-recognised startups get a narrow 10-year window to grant founders ESOPs.
- The Paytm founder having to surrender 21 million unvested ESOPs shows the control and forfeiture risk of dressing a founder up as an option-holder.
Open
startup-movers.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
The India-specific piece that tells you where the split actually gets signed. It separates the founders' agreement (equity, roles, IP, vesting between you) from the shareholders' agreement (your terms with investors), and stresses the timing that trips Indian founders up: get vesting in writing before shares are issued, because you cannot bolt it on retroactively once the cap table exists. It also breaks down good-leaver vs bad-leaver treatment, which is the clause that decides what a departing cofounder actually keeps.
From
Treelife
by Treelife
10 min read
- Document cofounder equity and vesting at or before incorporation and before shares issue, since Indian law makes retroactive vesting nearly impossible without every founder consenting
- The 4-year vest with 1-year cliff is standard in India too, with unvested shares forfeited to the company at nominal price in a bad-leaver exit
- Negotiate clear, objective good-leaver vs bad-leaver criteria and ensure already-vested shares are retained regardless of how you exit
Open
treelife.in →