✍️ Essay
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
When there is no category report to point at, you have to build the number yourself, and this is the essay that teaches you how. It walks through bottoms-up sizing (start from your actual customer, their willingness to pay, and how you will reach them) and shows why the top-down 'we just need 1 percent of a huge market' story falls apart. Treat it as the method for a defensible estimate, not a promise about how big you will get.
From
Andreessen Horowitz
by Anu Hariharan, Frank Chen, Jeff Jordan
~20 min read
- Build TAM from the bottom up: real customer profile times realistic price times how many you can actually reach and sell to.
- Top-down percentages inflate the number and hide the hard part, which is distribution and go to market.
- Some of the best companies (eBay, Airbnb) started against a market that looked small, then expanded the use case, so a modest starting number is not a dealbreaker.
Open
a16z.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This piece names the exact trap you are trying to avoid: googling an industry stat and assuming you just need 1 percent of it to build a billion-dollar company. It calls that the wrong approach and walks you to the fix, sizing TAM as annual revenue per customer times the number of customers who actually match your profile and would pay. It is short, practical, and aimed at the pitch slide where founders most often fake a big TAM.
From
TechCrunch
by Jose Cayasso
Short read, roughly 8 to 10 minutes
- The 1 percent of a huge market claim reads as fantasy math to investors and quietly costs you credibility on the market slide.
- Size the market from the bottom up: revenue per customer times the count of customers who genuinely fit your target and are willing to pay.
- Doing this forces you to actually know your target persona and buyer, which is the real thing investors are checking for.
Open
techcrunch.com →