📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This is the empirical spine for the employee half of your answer, built on Carta data from 50,000 real cap tables, not opinion. It shows equity drops fast: hire #1 sits around 1.5% at median (0.5% to 4% range), hire #2 at 0.85%, hire #3 already near 0.5%. That anchors your 0.5% to 2% call for a genuinely early, critical below-market hire and tells you exactly how fast to shrink grants as you keep hiring.
From
SaaStr
by Jason Lemkin
8 min read
- Median first-hire grant is about 1.5%, but the honest working range is 0.5% to 4% depending on how early and how critical
- Each subsequent hire drops 20% to 50%: by hire #3 you are usually below 1%
- Every grant assumes 4-year vesting with a 1-year cliff, which is non-negotiable market standard, not a nicety
Open
saastr.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
Once you have decided a key hire gets an ESOP grant and not co-founder shares, this is the India-specific playbook for actually doing it: pool sizing (5% to 15%), the mandatory one-year minimum vesting the Companies Act imposes, exercise price at fair market value, and the DPIIT-recognised-startup carve-outs. It is the practical alternative to over-granting equity, written for the Indian cap table you are actually running.
From
Razorpay Rize
by Razorpay Rize
15 min read
- Carve a 5% to 15% ESOP pool and grant a key hire from it instead of founder-level shares
- Indian law mandates a minimum one-year gap between grant and first vesting; a four-year vest with a one-year cliff is standard
- DPIIT-recognised startups get specific ESOP exemptions, so recognition status changes what you can grant and to whom
Open
razorpay.com →