📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This is the single clearest articulation of the exact call you are making: equity is a counterbalance to risk, and someone taking little salary at the true zero stage (Employee #1 at effectively 10%, four-year vest) is functionally a co-founder, while a market-rate hire after you have raised belongs in the 0.1% to 5% band. It hands you concrete numbers to argue yourself out of giving away a third of the company for a role that is really a senior hire.
From
Hustle Fund
by Elizabeth Yin
12 min read
- Price equity against the cash and risk the person is actually giving up, not against a title or a gut feeling
- A pre-funding first hire on near-zero salary is basically a co-founder (up to ~10%); a post-raise hire on market pay is a 0.1% to 5% employee
- Vest everything over four years with a one-year cliff so the grant tracks contribution, not the handshake
Open
hustlecommons.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
Once you have decided a key hire gets an ESOP grant and not co-founder shares, this is the India-specific playbook for actually doing it: pool sizing (5% to 15%), the mandatory one-year minimum vesting the Companies Act imposes, exercise price at fair market value, and the DPIIT-recognised-startup carve-outs. It is the practical alternative to over-granting equity, written for the Indian cap table you are actually running.
From
Razorpay Rize
by Razorpay Rize
15 min read
- Carve a 5% to 15% ESOP pool and grant a key hire from it instead of founder-level shares
- Indian law mandates a minimum one-year gap between grant and first vesting; a four-year vest with a one-year cliff is standard
- DPIIT-recognised startups get specific ESOP exemptions, so recognition status changes what you can grant and to whom
Open
razorpay.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
This is the durable reference for the structural line between a co-founder and a hire: co-founders own the company outright on day one, everyone hired afterward comes through the option pool, and even a senior non-founding CTO or VP lands in the 0.8% to 1.5% executive band, not the founder tier. Reading it makes the cost of mislabeling a senior hire as a co-founder concrete before you sign anything.
From
Index Ventures
by Index Ventures
20 min read
- Co-founders start with 100% between them; every later hire is granted from the ESOP pool, a hard structural distinction
- A non-founding C-level or VP hire typically lands around 0.8% to 1.5%, an order of magnitude below founder equity
- Model the dilution across future rounds before you grant, since a founder-sized grant compounds into a very expensive mistake
Open
indexventures.com →