✍️ Essay
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This is the clearest short piece on why "I love fintech" falls short: it argues that fit is about a specific problem you cannot stop thinking about, not a category you find interesting. It leans on Sequoia's Roelof Botha to make the honest point that broad interest wilts under pressure, while a founder tied to one sharp problem keeps going. A good starting point for pressure-testing whether your fit is a real edge or just a comfortable industry you like.
From
FourWeekMBA
by Gennaro Cuofano
~8 min read
- Loving an industry is not fit. Being unable to walk away from one specific problem is.
- Founder-problem fit comes before product-market fit: the deep pull toward a problem is what carries you through the hard middle.
- If your motivation is "I want to start a company in fintech" rather than "this exact broken thing has to be fixed", narrow it before you build.
Open
fourweekmba.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
Once you accept that "I love fintech" is too broad, this article hands you a concrete way to sharpen it into something defensible. Its "only" test (we are the only product built specifically for [segment] who need to [core job] because we [unfair advantage]) forces you to name your edge out loud, and if you cannot finish the sentence with conviction, your fit is still too vague. A practical starting point for turning a fuzzy interest into a position you can actually defend.
From
Euro SaaS Edge
by Arttu Huhtiniemi
~10 min read
- Finish this sentence honestly: "We are the only product for [segment] who need [job] because we [unfair advantage]." If you cannot, you are still too broad.
- Score candidate segments on unfair advantage, pain, reachability, and willingness to pay instead of chasing the loudest or biggest logo.
- Choosing a sharp niche means accepting that some customers will churn. That is positioning working, not failing.
Open
eurosaasedge.com →