Why we picked it This is the canonical newcomer walkthrough: Christensen shows a team improving a milkshake on every obvious dimension and moving nothing, because they had the job wrong. It makes the good-versus-bad framing concrete in a few minutes, which is exactly the trap founders fall into when they optimize a feature instead of the job. Start here if the concept still feels abstract.
Clay Christensen: The Jobs to be Done Theory (the milkshake example)
On YouTube by Clayton Christensen (HubSpot Marketing) ~5 min
- Improving a product on the wrong dimensions is what a bad job statement looks like in practice.
- The same product can be hired for very different jobs (the morning commute versus the afternoon treat), so the situation defines the job.
- Watch what people hire and fire, not just what they say they want, to name the job correctly.