Save Thousands On Legal Fees: 5 ChatGPT Prompts To Master Contracts
Five founder-tested prompts covering summary, risk, and negotiation angles.
Open forbes.com →Treat the model like a sharp junior associate: give it a role, the jurisdiction, your risk appetite, and a required output format, then work clause by clause instead of asking 'is this contract OK'. Ask for risk tables, plain-English summaries, market-standard comparisons, and specific negotiation asks. Verify anything that sounds like a legal citation, and never send AI output anywhere important unreviewed.
A quick orientation. The real value is below: resources worth your time, from people who've actually done it.
Five founder-tested prompts covering summary, risk, and negotiation angles.
Open forbes.com →Actual lawyer prompts for issue spotting, steal them wholesale.
Open spellbook.com →Broader prompt library spanning drafting, review, and client communication.
Open spellbook.com →The ABA's official prompting guidance: structured, contextual, iterative, with jurisdiction always stated.
Open americanbar.org →Task-by-task prompt patterns plus a frank list of what not to trust it with.
Open juro.com →Eight refined prompts with the reasoning behind each one's structure.
Open juro.com →Includes the executive-summary and industry-standards-comparison prompts founders use most.
Open promptadvance.club →Claude-specific prompting, since Claude's structured outputs suit contract tables especially well.
Open thelegalprompts.com →A law firm's internal Claude playbook made public.
Open everinghamlegal.com →Anthropic's own legal counsel and a global AI law partner demo how professionals actually prompt Claude.
Watch on YouTube youtube.com →Senior practitioners compare outputs on the same legal tasks so you pick the right model per job.
Watch on YouTube youtube.com →A rapid three-way test on a real legal question, instructive about variance between tools.
Watch on YouTube youtube.com →Watch the prompt-refine-verify loop performed live on a contract.
Watch on YouTube youtube.com →The fastest possible demonstration of the core review prompt.
Watch on YouTube m.youtube.com →A practitioner's honest account of where Claude's legal outputs beat ChatGPT's.
Open attorneyatwork.com →Drafting-side prompts to complement the review-side ones.
Open strongsuit.com →Three-model comparison so you stop assuming all chatbots give the same legal answer.
Open everintentlegalai.com →Current attorney workflows showing how prompts chain into a full review process.
Open gavel.io →