📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
This is the actual Companies Act 2013 mechanics for the thing you want to do: put your co-founder's 5 lakh cheque in as a director's loan, not equity. It spells out the June 2016 startup exemption, the written declaration that the money is the director's own (not itself borrowed), and the board-report disclosure, so your CA can paper it correctly instead of quietly issuing shares against cash.
From
Lawyered.in
by Lawyered Legal Team
8 min read
- A private company can accept a loan from a director if the director signs a declaration that the funds are their own and not themselves borrowed, disclosed in the board's report.
- The June 2016 MCA exemption notification relaxed deposit rules specifically for private companies and startups, making a clean founder loan straightforward.
- A loan is repayable debt with defined terms, structurally separate from equity, which is exactly why founder cash belongs here and not on the cap table.
Open
lawyered.in →
📖 Book
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
Most equity-split writing is American and ignores that India has no 83(b) election and its own sweat-equity rules. This chapter tells you to buy your founder shares at incorporation when face value is 10 rupees and FMV is nominal, because waiting means a higher FMV and a higher tax hit, which is the concrete Indian reason to split before you raise.
From
Swimming With Sharks (Indian founder funding guide)
by Swimming With Sharks
30 min read
- Split and issue founder shares at incorporation when FMV is nominal (10 rupee face value); delay raises FMV and your immediate tax.
- India has no 83(b) equivalent, so timing and paperwork matter differently than in US-centric advice.
- Section 54 sweat-equity shares carry heavy compliance (special resolution, valuation report, lock-in), so founders usually just take regular equity and keep cash separate.
Open
swimming-with-sharks.pages.dev →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This is the cleanest statement of your core thesis: money in and sweat in are different instruments. Slicing Pie prices cash at a 4x multiplier and time at 2x precisely because a rupee out of your bank is riskier and scarcer than an hour of work, which is the reasoning that stops a 5 lakh cheque from silently becoming 30 percent of the company.
From
Slicing Pie
by Mike Moyer
7 min read
- Cash contributions carry a 4x risk multiplier and non-cash (time, ideas) a 2x, because real money out of pocket is scarcer and riskier than sweat.
- Treating cash and sweat as separate, differently-priced inputs is what keeps one founder's cheque from swallowing the cap table.
- The multiplier logic gives you a defensible, non-arbitrary way to explain to a co-founder why their cash is repaid or converts, not just gifted equity.
Open
slicingpie.com →