✍️ Essay
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
A scoring matrix ranks ideas on paper, but the honest tiebreaker is which idea real people reach for. Todd Jackson (First Round) built this from interviews with founders of Vanta, LaunchDarkly and others, and it lays out cheap tests you can run on both ideas in parallel: customer interviews, mockups, fake landing pages, and doing the work manually before you build anything. Run the same test on both ideas and let the demand signal, not the debate, pick the winner.
From
Lenny's Newsletter
by Todd Jackson
~25 min read
- Watch for a problem being pulled out of your hands, not polite interest; a lukewarm nice to have is a signal to drop it.
- You can test both ideas with mockups, a landing page, or manual fulfillment before writing a line of code.
- Validation is a confidence level you build with evidence, not a yes or no you argue your way to.
Open
lennysnewsletter.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Freemium
Beginner
Why we picked it
Sometimes the two ideas are a proxy for a deeper problem: you have no agreed way to make a call when you disagree. This HBR piece treats disagreement as a skill and pushes you to set decision rules in advance, including who gets the final say on which kinds of calls, so a single stuck choice does not calcify into resentment. It is short and pairs well with a disagree and commit rule: back one idea for a defined window with pre-agreed metrics, then review.
From
Harvard Business Review
by Evelyn Nam
~8 min read
- Decide ahead of time who owns which decisions, so a deadlock has a built-in tiebreaker instead of grinding to a halt.
- Commit to one direction for a set period with clear metrics, then revisit, rather than relitigating it every week.
- Unresolved founder conflict is a leading reason startups fail, so treating this as urgent is warranted, not dramatic.
Open
hbr.org →