How do the best companies pay reps in a hybrid or product-led motion where the product sourced the deal?
The short answer
They pay the rep and adjust the quota, rather than fighting about attribution. If self serve revenue lands in a rep's account and they had any hand in it, credit it and size their quota to include it, because the alternative is a rep who actively works against your own product's conversion funnel. The clean variants are: same rate on expansions with a 12 month credit window, or a higher rate (around 20 percent) on the first contract with nothing on later expansion when the account hands off to CS. Audit a sample of self serve closures each quarter to check there was real sales involvement, and pay on retained expansion so nobody is rewarded for a seat spike that churns.
Go deeper, your way
4 hand-picked resources, 1 India-specific, 4 link-checked. Pick how you want to dig in.
📄 Article
✓ Link checkedFreeAdvanced
Why we picked it
Three concrete ways to handle the awkward case where the product sourced the deal, including a higher first contract rate with no expansion pay. It answers the specific question rather than talking about PLG in general.
Why we picked it
A worked example for a 3M dollar ARR business with two or three reps: 200k OTE at 50:50, quarterly targets blending new, expansion and churn recovery, a 30 percent threshold and accelerators past 115 percent. Rare to see actual numbers.
Why we picked it
Five design rules worth memorising, including show causality and keep the payout cycle under 60 days, plus a business case method for setting targets from total team cost rather than from wishful top down math.
Why we picked it
From the Chennai-built comp platform that actually runs these plans for hundreds of companies. It gives the pay mix by role (50/50 for AEs, 70/30 for support roles) and the 4x to 6x OTE quota benchmark you can sanity check yourself against.