What is a fair quota for my first rep when we have no history to go on?
Start from cost, not from ambition. The common anchors are quota at four to six times OTE, or David Sacks's rule of 10 where quota is about ten times base salary, and the two land in similar places. Then sanity check it bottom up: how many deals can one person actually run given your sales cycle and average deal size, and does the pipeline you can generate support that. If bottom up gives you half of what top down gives you, your problem is pipeline, not the rep, and setting the higher number will only get you a resignation. Set it for a period at least as long as your sales cycle, so a six month cycle cannot have a monthly quota.
Go deeper
5 resources, 1 India-specific, 5 link-checked.
✍️ Essay
✓ Link checkedFreeIntermediate
The clearest arithmetic anywhere on rep economics: the rule of 10 for quota against base, four months to productivity, draws during ramp, and why teams attain about 70 percent of quota capacity so you must plan over capacity.
Written for Indian SaaS founders by the Everstage CEO, ex Freshworks. It gives the working numbers: quota period must be at least the sales cycle, quota to OTE around 5 to 6x, and two thirds of reps landing between 80 and 100 percent attainment.
The numbers you want when arguing about a plan: median commission around 11.5 percent of ACV, AE pay mix near 53:47, quota to OTE median 4.2x, and a median SaaS win rate of 19 percent. Use it to check whether your plan is normal.
The headcount question answered as arithmetic: revenue target divided by revenue per rep and capacity utilisation, with ramp time and attrition built in. Use it before you sign off next quarter's hiring plan.
Two people who have set a first rep's number many times argue it out: how quota relates to OTE, what to guarantee during ramp, and when a miss is the plan's fault rather than the rep's. It gives you the judgement the multiplier rules leave out.