📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
This is the honest-framing playbook the answer describes. It tells you to target people who want to learn and grow with a strong founding team (not the maximum-cash candidate), to educate a candidate on not just how many shares but what slice of the whole pie those shares are, and to make an explicit written commitment to correct salaries post-Series A. That last move is exactly what wins over an Indian candidate who has never held startup equity and needs to see a real path to market rate.
From
First Round Review
by First Round Review
18 min read
- Hire people motivated by learning and upside, not top-of-market cash: a below-market offer only holds if the person wants what you are actually offering.
- Explain equity fully: how many shares, what percentage of total outstanding that is, and the current valuation, so the candidate can price the tradeoff themselves.
- A company-wide below-market policy with an explicit commitment to fix comp at a named milestone (post-Series A) reads as integrity, not a lowball.
Open
review.firstround.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
Free
Intermediate
Why we picked it
The discipline half of the answer. When cash is tight the reflex is to over-give equity to close the gap, and this piece pushes back hard: you have more leverage than you think, and your first ten hires together should not blow past a roughly 10 percent pool. It gives you a defensible comp philosophy to state out loud instead of negotiating equity ad hoc per candidate, which is what breeds the resentment the answer warns about.
From
First Round Review
by Kaitlyn Knopp (Pequity), via First Round Review
20 min read
- Do not paper over a low salary with runaway equity: keep the first ten hires inside a disciplined pool (around 10 percent total).
- Define a comp philosophy before you start hiring so every offer is consistent and defensible, not reverse-engineered per candidate.
- Contract-to-hire is now acceptable to strong talent and can bridge a cash gap without permanently underpaying.
Open
review.firstround.com →
📄 Article
✓ Link checked
India
Free
Beginner
Why we picked it
This is the India-specific explainer you hand a candidate who has never held equity. It defines pool, vesting (typically 3 to 4 years with a lock-in), and exercise price in plain language, and it does not skip the part Indian candidates get burned by: ESOP gains are taxed twice, as a perquisite at exercise (at your income slab) and again as capital gains at sale. It also cites the Companies Act 2013 and SEBI framework, so the numbers you promise are grounded in the actual Indian rules, not a US template.
From
Razorpay
by Razorpay Learn
15 min read
- Walks through grant, vesting, and exercise price in plain terms a first employee can follow without a finance background.
- Spells out the India tax trap: perquisite tax at exercise plus capital gains at sale, which many candidates never see coming.
- Anchored to the Companies Act 2013 and SEBI rules, so your ESOP framing matches how equity actually works for an Indian Pvt Ltd.
Open
razorpay.com →