My comp plan is being gamed. How do I find it and fix it mid-year?
Gaming is a design bug, not a character flaw, so go looking for it in the data before you go looking for it in people. Sort deals by discount, by contract length, by the day of the quarter they closed, and by how many were amended within 60 days, and the leak usually shows up as a cluster. The classic patterns are sandbagging into the next SPIFF, discounting to clear a threshold, and stuffing multi year terms to hit an accelerator. Fix the specific loophole, not the whole plan, and never do it retroactively. Announce the change for the next period with the reasoning, because taking money off a rep's already booked deal buys you a resignation.
Go deeper
5 resources, 1 India-specific, 5 link-checked.
📄 Article
✓ Link checkedIndiaFreeIntermediate
The operating cadence rather than the design theory: review quarterly, change annually, roll out in phases, and the line worth quoting back to anyone defending a complicated plan, that if a rep needs a spreadsheet and a half hour meeting to understand it, it is already too late.
Honest about the failure modes, sandbagging in anticipation of the next SPIFF, budget creep, and erosion of intrinsic motivation, plus the spacing discipline (one major program a quarter) that keeps them working.
Five design rules worth memorising, including show causality and keep the payout cycle under 60 days, plus a business case method for setting targets from total team cost rather than from wishful top down math.
The numbers you want when arguing about a plan: median commission around 11.5 percent of ACV, AE pay mix near 53:47, quota to OTE median 4.2x, and a median SaaS win rate of 19 percent. Use it to check whether your plan is normal.
A comp leader on how you spot a plan being worked around and what a mid-year correction costs you in trust. Useful because it treats the fix as a people problem as much as a spreadsheet one.