What NRR should a genuinely best-in-class company target in my segment?
Bessemer's bands are the ones boards use: 100 percent is good, 110 percent is better, 120 percent and above is best. But segment moves the goalposts hard. Enterprise SaaS is judged around 110 percent good and 130 percent great, land-and-expand mid market around 90 and 110, consumer SaaS around 55 and 80. So a consumer subscription at 85 percent is outperforming an enterprise product at 105. Know which benchmark you are being measured against before you agree to a target, and quote gross retention alongside it so nobody mistakes concentrated expansion for a healthy base.
Go deeper
5 resources, 5 link-checked.
📊 Report
✓ Link checkedFreeAdvanced
The good, better, best NRR bands (100, 110, 120 plus) that boards actually benchmark against, sitting alongside the efficiency metrics they get judged with.
The benchmark study everyone quotes: good and great net revenue retention by business type, built from 20 growth experts plus real public company numbers. It stops the 'is 105 percent good' argument in one page.
Kellogg's argument that churn has too many definitions to be trustworthy, and that private companies should measure NDR the way public ones do. The slides are the reference deck for this debate.
The formula written out term by term, with the three performance bands. The right first read if you have been nodding along in NRR conversations without being sure of the calculation.
Fresher than the Bessemer bands and cut by segment, so you can see where your kind of company actually sits rather than where software in general sits. It also reports gross retention alongside net, which is the pairing this question insists on.