Why we picked it This is the cleanest, most concrete catalogue of the exact question shapes that quietly steer a person to the answer you already want. It names five specific traps (rephrasing what you think you saw, assuming a problem and blaming the user, suggesting the answer, naming interface elements the user never used, and assuming their emotions) and gives a neutral rewrite for each, so you can pattern-match your own script before an interview. It stays practical rather than academic, which is the right altitude when you are about to sit across from a real customer.
Avoid Leading Questions to Get Better Insights from Participants
From Nielsen Norman Group by Amy Schade about 7 min read
- Leading questions bury the answer you want inside the question, so people mirror your words instead of telling you what actually happened.
- The fixes are specific: swap suggested outcomes ("how well did this save you time?") for open ones ("what was easy or hard about this?"), and never name a feature the user has not named first.
- Watch for questions that assume an emotion or a problem ("when you were struggling..."), because they quietly plant a reality that may not be true for that person.