What GTM efficiency numbers are investors actually benchmarking us against right now?
The short answer
The bar moved after 2022 and it has not moved back. Growth alone stopped being enough, and the pair investors now lead with is CAC payback and net revenue retention, because together they predict whether a business compounds. Recent benchmark work across hundreds of private B2B companies puts median growth in the mid twenties percent with NRR hovering around one hundred percent, well below the one hundred and twenty percent that used to be table stakes, so know which cohort you are being compared to before you panic. Bessemer's bands are the most useful stage adjusted reference: roughly two hundred percent growth at one to ten million dollars ARR falling toward sixty percent past a hundred million, with CAC payback under twelve months good and under six best in class. For Indian companies there is a genuine structural edge here, since a comparable revenue base is built on a much smaller sales and marketing spend.
Go deeper, your way
4 hand-picked resources, 1 India-specific, 4 link-checked. Pick how you want to dig in.
📊 Report
✓ Link checkedFreemiumAdvanced
Why we picked it
Survey data from over eight hundred private companies, with an efficient growth matrix that plots CAC payback against NRR so you can locate yourself rather than just read averages.
Why we picked it
Pavilion's data comes from operators rather than investors, and the headline numbers on the page (median growth, NRR compression, burn multiple) are enough to calibrate without downloading anything.
Why we picked it
Sets out exactly what a repeatable sales motion is supposed to look like by ten million dollars ARR, with the four GTM metrics investors will actually check. The right benchmark set for a company still building its ops function.
Why we picked it
Lays out Upekkha's Value SaaS argument that SaaS built from India is structurally capital efficient, which changes what a healthy CAC payback or magic number looks like for an Indian company.