Marketing says it sourced the pipeline, sales says it did not. How do I do attribution without fooling myself?
The short answer
Accept that software attribution measures what is clickable, not what is persuasive, and the gap is enormous. Refine Labs tracked 620 declared-intent conversions against 21.5 million dollars of closed-won revenue and found self-reported data credited podcasts with 53 percent of revenue while the tracking software credited them with zero. So run both. Ask every inbound lead one open question about how they heard of you, keep the tracked data for optimising within a channel, and use holdout or geo tests when you need to know whether a channel actually caused anything. Then stop arguing about who sourced a deal and agree on one shared pipeline number, because sourced-versus-influenced is a scoreboard fight nobody wins.
Go deeper, your way
3 hand-picked resources, 3 link-checked. Pick how you want to dig in.
🎧 Podcast
✓ Link checkedFreemiumIntermediate
Why we picked it
Shopify's performance marketing lead on channel order (Google search first, LinkedIn reserved for tight B2B targeting because of cost), team structure and incrementality. The rare paid conversation that is not selling you an agency.
Why we picked it
The single most quotable attribution finding we know of: across 620 declared-intent conversions and 21.5 million dollars of closed-won revenue, self-reported data credited podcasts with 53 percent of revenue and the software credited them with 0 percent.
Why we picked it
The other half of the answer: how to actually find out whether a channel caused anything, using holdouts, geo tests and lift studies. It is also honest that click attribution flatters brand search and retargeting, which convert regardless.